Indiana n Evansville ssearch;
Evansville nsearcht Credit esearch Quote a
asearche Tag
Indiana i Quote h Ratesmortgagemortgage1st searche Credit c Quote m Credit a Credit e
Remortgage vnv
lsearche Evansville o Remortgage searchag Remortgage Ev Ratesmortgagemortgage1st nsv Indiana ll Tag Evansville sea Tag csearchlsearchesearchr Tag hsearch
ve
ssearchfsearche Ratesmortgagemortgage1st Remortgage o Tag dsearchi Quote de Remortgage .I Quote searchhsearch Evansville a Remortgage agersearchm Remortgage ssearchlsearch searchg Evansville esearchs Quote ihsearchm Credit r Remortgage e Credit
osearchea Evansville t Quote Remortgage n Tag v Credit l Indiana e Credit ,searchs Indiana e Tag wsearchl Quote olsearcho Evansville
passive
management approach. She constructs a
portfolio that mimics the index along several dimensions of risk,
and the return on the portfolio should track the return on the
index fairly closely.
Using Liabilities as a Benchmark
The investment objective when managing a bond portfolio against a single liability or set of liabilities is rather straightforward; the manager must manage the portfolio to maintain sufficient portfolio value to meet the liabilities.
BOND INDEXING STRATEGIES
As you may surmise from this LOS, there are many different strategies that can be followed when managing a bond portfolio. For example, the manager can assume a completely passive approach and not have to forecast anything. In other words, the manager who feels he has no reason to disagree with market forecasts has no reason to assume he can outperform an indexing strategy through active management. On the other hand, a manager who is confident in his forecasting abilities and has reason to believe market forecasts are incorrect can generate significant return through active management.
The differences between the various active
management approaches are mostly matters of degree. That is, bond
portfolio management strategies form more or less a continuum from
an almost do-nothing approach (i.e., pure bond indexing) to a
do-almost-anything approach (i.e., full-blown active management) as
demonstrated graphically in
In Figure 1, you will notice the increase of three characteristics as you move from pure bond indexing to full-blown active management. The first, increasing active management, can be defined as the gradual relaxation of restrictions on the manager's actions to allow him to exploit his superior forecasting/valuation abilities. With pure bond indexing, the manager is restricted to constructing a portfolio with all the securities in the index and
in the same weights as the index. This means the
portfolio will have exactly the same risk
The next characteristic, increasing expected return, refers to the increase in portfolio expected return from actions taken by the manager. Unless the manager has some superior ability that enables him to identify profitable situations, he should stick with pure bond indexing or at least match primary risk factors.
The third characteristic, increasing tracking error, refers to the degree to which the portfolio return tracks that of the index. With pure bond indexing, even though management fees and transactions are incurred, the reduced return on the portfolio will closely track the return on the index. As you move to the right, the composition and
factor exposures of the portfolio differ more and more from the index. Each enhancement is intended to increase the portfolio return, but is not guaranteed to do so. Thus, the amount by which the portfolio return exceeds the index return can be quite variable
from period to period and even negative. The difference between the portfolio and index returns (i.e., the portfolio excess return) is referred to as alpha. The standard deviation of alpha across several periods is referred to as tracking error, thus it is the variability of the portfolio excess return that increases as you move towards full-blown active management. This increased variability translates into increased uncertainty.
The five classifications of bond portfolio management can be described as: (1) pure bond indexing, (2) enhanced indexing by matching primary risk factors, (3) enhanced indexing by small risk foetor mismatches, (4) active management by larger risk foetor mismatches, and (5) full-blown active management.
Income" />Pure Bond Indexing
This is the easiest strategy to describe as well as understand. In a pure bond indexing strategy, the manager replicates every dimension of the index. Every bond in the index is purchased and its weight in the portfolio is determined by its weight in the index. Due
to varying bond liquidities and availabilities, this strategy, though easy to describe, is difficult and costly to implement.
顶